SAW simply can't figure out the rationale for this silly scheme in the US, now the latest recipient of government largesse. Cash is handed out for returning an old non-fuel-efficient car, which is then applied as part payment for the purchase of a newer fuel-efficient car.
Given that vast swathes of the American population are now in debt, all this scheme does is add debt on debt.
© 2009 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
Showing posts with label Debt Creation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debt Creation. Show all posts
Thursday, August 06, 2009
Tuesday, March 03, 2009
Humility & Humongous Banks
SAW having kept his mouth shut for a few weeks to see which way the financial winds of change were blowing, has discovered that other than shaking like leaves in a hurricane, the global elite of bankers and the hapless politicians don’t have a clue.
Davos 2009 was a washout, with some CEOs too embarrassed to attend.
The European Union has discovered to its horror that it’s not unified at all, but consists of 3 distinct economic blocs: firstly Germany France and the U; secondly the southern European countries like Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece whose real estate bubble has burst; thirdly the impoverished Eastern European countries to whose toxic debt the other European countries were exposed in addition to the US garbage. With Germany emerging as a reluctant central banker to the EU, there are pleas to avoid protectionism within the Eurozone which carries with it the spectre of a new Iron Curtain between rich and poor Europe.
Obama grins while throwing trillions at an unquantifiable problem and simultaneously promises new infrastructure projects and increased government stakes in Citigroup and others that still pretend to be banks. How he proposes to spread the wealth back to the middle and working class in the face of the greatest and utterly fraudulent engineered scam, that for 7 years sucked the wealth into the hands of the (unprosecuted) banking elite, remains to be seen.
No doubt as part of his inclusive policies, he’ll have to defer to those bankers complaining that they’re being unfairly bashed. The American Bankers Association bleated to Obama that very few banks were involved in the toxic debts. Numerically, that may be true. But those on Wall Street and elsewhere who were involved, leveraged their exposure to outrageous levels and sabotaged the real economy. Any good that came out of it was the realization that merging fractional reserve banking with the debt addiction of US consumers, for whom repayment was a novel concept, was bound to affect the banks Balance Sheet sooner or later – no matter how exotic the debt instrument or the credit default swap daisy chain that purportedly backed it.
Case in point, AIG that insured those credit default swaps and is now described as a “systemic risk”, is back for a second bite of US30 Billion the government cherry after its first chomp of US150 Billion. It faced a credit downgrade in the face of a US 61.7 Billion loss for the last 3 months of 2008 (apparently the largest quarterly loss in corporate history).
It’s right up there with the talent to be found at RBS.
Or HSBC, whose sub-prime exposure to the US market necessitated a cash call of US 17.7 Billion through a rights issue in the UK (the biggest in UK history), the closure of its consumer lending business in the US, and a cut in dividend.
What really cracked SAW up were HSBC’s statements of contrition, which included this gem that there had to be a reversion to some of the older principles of banking in terms of a simpler sense of providing good customer service, good relationship management and a sensible approach to liquidity.
“Reversion”???!!! why on earth would an apparently prudent bank diverge from those principles?
Oh yeah……….unbridled greed coz everybody else was doing it.
© 2009 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
Davos 2009 was a washout, with some CEOs too embarrassed to attend.
The European Union has discovered to its horror that it’s not unified at all, but consists of 3 distinct economic blocs: firstly Germany France and the U; secondly the southern European countries like Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece whose real estate bubble has burst; thirdly the impoverished Eastern European countries to whose toxic debt the other European countries were exposed in addition to the US garbage. With Germany emerging as a reluctant central banker to the EU, there are pleas to avoid protectionism within the Eurozone which carries with it the spectre of a new Iron Curtain between rich and poor Europe.
Obama grins while throwing trillions at an unquantifiable problem and simultaneously promises new infrastructure projects and increased government stakes in Citigroup and others that still pretend to be banks. How he proposes to spread the wealth back to the middle and working class in the face of the greatest and utterly fraudulent engineered scam, that for 7 years sucked the wealth into the hands of the (unprosecuted) banking elite, remains to be seen.
No doubt as part of his inclusive policies, he’ll have to defer to those bankers complaining that they’re being unfairly bashed. The American Bankers Association bleated to Obama that very few banks were involved in the toxic debts. Numerically, that may be true. But those on Wall Street and elsewhere who were involved, leveraged their exposure to outrageous levels and sabotaged the real economy. Any good that came out of it was the realization that merging fractional reserve banking with the debt addiction of US consumers, for whom repayment was a novel concept, was bound to affect the banks Balance Sheet sooner or later – no matter how exotic the debt instrument or the credit default swap daisy chain that purportedly backed it.
Case in point, AIG that insured those credit default swaps and is now described as a “systemic risk”, is back for a second bite of US30 Billion the government cherry after its first chomp of US150 Billion. It faced a credit downgrade in the face of a US 61.7 Billion loss for the last 3 months of 2008 (apparently the largest quarterly loss in corporate history).
It’s right up there with the talent to be found at RBS.
Or HSBC, whose sub-prime exposure to the US market necessitated a cash call of US 17.7 Billion through a rights issue in the UK (the biggest in UK history), the closure of its consumer lending business in the US, and a cut in dividend.
What really cracked SAW up were HSBC’s statements of contrition, which included this gem that there had to be a reversion to some of the older principles of banking in terms of a simpler sense of providing good customer service, good relationship management and a sensible approach to liquidity.
“Reversion”???!!! why on earth would an apparently prudent bank diverge from those principles?
Oh yeah……….unbridled greed coz everybody else was doing it.
© 2009 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
Monday, November 24, 2008
The Bigger The Trough
…..the larger their snouts…..
The US auto companies didn’t quite get the warm political reception they’d hoped for as part of their grubbing for US25 billion. Given that all 3 claim to be on the verge of bankruptcy, it didn’t help their case that the CEOs arrived in private jets. In mitigation, General Motors is returning 3 of its leased jets while promising greater use of video conferencing…..
Oh, and being asked by politicians to spell out exactly why they need capital, what they intend to do with it, over what time frame and what kind of returns to expect, was hardly a surprise. Any SME, whether looking for factoring funds, seed capital, mezzanine financing, venture capital or a bank loan would be asked exactly the same questions. What gave the auto companies’ CEOs the temerity to think they’d be exempt from the basic criteria of accountability?
Probably the fact that to date neither the US Federal Reserve nor the Treasury will disclose exactly what securities they have accepted as part of the now scrapped “cash for trash” deal that was the original TARP. The new plan to directly take equity in the banks (and potentially anyone else) has already been derided as incipient nationalization and crony capitalism. Oversight provisions as to how the government funds will be dealt with once injected, are non-existent, other than a bland assumption that the funds will be deployed for lending.
Meanwhile, according to Calculated Risk, as of 21 November 2008, 22 US banks have failed this year – so far. In fairness, some banks in the US, particularly those that stayed well away from the financially engineered toxic debt instruments, are doing just fine and are happy to continue and extend lines of credit to well managed commercial clients.
And the boys at Citigroup – whose share price is now that of an enhanced penny stock - are working overtime negotiating a government bailout or a sell off (of their lucrative credit card business, the Smith Barney brokerage, or their recently appointed CEO Vikram Pandit who announced jobs cuts totalling 82,000).
The joys of being an international conglomerate like Citigroup, allow for a degree of self-righteousness flatly denied to private companies: Citi is too big too fail and must be “saved” to end the hysteria; as a US company operating all over the world overseas governments should help bail it out; Citi is a victim of short sellers whose stock price has a reached a level that necessitates government intervention by way of cash injection, absorption of bad loans and an assisted merger.
Um… OK… government intervention for whose benefit? The shareholders or the financial system?
© 2008 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
The US auto companies didn’t quite get the warm political reception they’d hoped for as part of their grubbing for US25 billion. Given that all 3 claim to be on the verge of bankruptcy, it didn’t help their case that the CEOs arrived in private jets. In mitigation, General Motors is returning 3 of its leased jets while promising greater use of video conferencing…..
Oh, and being asked by politicians to spell out exactly why they need capital, what they intend to do with it, over what time frame and what kind of returns to expect, was hardly a surprise. Any SME, whether looking for factoring funds, seed capital, mezzanine financing, venture capital or a bank loan would be asked exactly the same questions. What gave the auto companies’ CEOs the temerity to think they’d be exempt from the basic criteria of accountability?
Probably the fact that to date neither the US Federal Reserve nor the Treasury will disclose exactly what securities they have accepted as part of the now scrapped “cash for trash” deal that was the original TARP. The new plan to directly take equity in the banks (and potentially anyone else) has already been derided as incipient nationalization and crony capitalism. Oversight provisions as to how the government funds will be dealt with once injected, are non-existent, other than a bland assumption that the funds will be deployed for lending.
Meanwhile, according to Calculated Risk, as of 21 November 2008, 22 US banks have failed this year – so far. In fairness, some banks in the US, particularly those that stayed well away from the financially engineered toxic debt instruments, are doing just fine and are happy to continue and extend lines of credit to well managed commercial clients.
And the boys at Citigroup – whose share price is now that of an enhanced penny stock - are working overtime negotiating a government bailout or a sell off (of their lucrative credit card business, the Smith Barney brokerage, or their recently appointed CEO Vikram Pandit who announced jobs cuts totalling 82,000).
The joys of being an international conglomerate like Citigroup, allow for a degree of self-righteousness flatly denied to private companies: Citi is too big too fail and must be “saved” to end the hysteria; as a US company operating all over the world overseas governments should help bail it out; Citi is a victim of short sellers whose stock price has a reached a level that necessitates government intervention by way of cash injection, absorption of bad loans and an assisted merger.
Um… OK… government intervention for whose benefit? The shareholders or the financial system?
© 2008 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Global Interest Rate Cuts
Earlier today, Hong Kong time, there was a coordinated response from the US Federal Reserve, Bank Of Canada, Bank of England, European Central Bank and the Riksbank of Sweden to cut interest rates by 50 basis points. All banks issued public statements in similar form, pointing out the need to take action in a slowing global economy.
Would it be impertinent to point out that interest rates are already low, have been for sometime and still the US economy, the European economies and the Asian economies are slowing or are expected to slow?
Is SAW missing something? How do lowered interest rates deal with the 2 fundamental issues of institutional decapitalization and deleveraging?
And if the problem is one of outrageous consumer debt and shoddy bank lending, are lowered interest rates going to make the banks thrilled to lend again to consumers who turned out to be lousy credit risks?
Not likely.
One of the widely read blogs, Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis, asserts in a posting, Global Coordinated Rate Cuts Won’t Solve Economic Crisis dated 8 October 200,8 that the root cause of this crisis is fractional reserve lending. Interesting……SAW is no economist just a simple lawyer, who in his previous post entitled What Crisis dated 1 October 2008 suspected the same thing.
As MIsh put it:
“The world is heading for a global recession and a sure bet is that it will be blamed on a subprime crisis in the US. The reality is the greatest liquidity experiment in history is now crashing to earth.
Would it be impertinent to point out that interest rates are already low, have been for sometime and still the US economy, the European economies and the Asian economies are slowing or are expected to slow?
Is SAW missing something? How do lowered interest rates deal with the 2 fundamental issues of institutional decapitalization and deleveraging?
And if the problem is one of outrageous consumer debt and shoddy bank lending, are lowered interest rates going to make the banks thrilled to lend again to consumers who turned out to be lousy credit risks?
Not likely.
One of the widely read blogs, Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis, asserts in a posting, Global Coordinated Rate Cuts Won’t Solve Economic Crisis dated 8 October 200,8 that the root cause of this crisis is fractional reserve lending. Interesting……SAW is no economist just a simple lawyer, who in his previous post entitled What Crisis dated 1 October 2008 suspected the same thing.
As MIsh put it:
“The world is heading for a global recession and a sure bet is that it will be blamed on a subprime crisis in the US. The reality is the greatest liquidity experiment in history is now crashing to earth.
The root cause of this crisis is fractional reserve lending, and micromanagement of interest rates by the Fed in particular and Central Banks in general. The Fed started the party by slashing interest rates to 1%, but Central Banks everywhere drank the same punch to varying degrees.
The Greenspan Fed lowering interest rates to 1% fueled the initial boom, but like an addict on heroin, the same dose a second time will not have the same effect. The Fed, the ECB, etc. could have slashed rates to 0% today and it would not have mattered one bit.
The reason is simple: There is no reason for banks to go on a lending spree with consumers tossing in the towel, unemployment rising, and rampant overcapacity everywhere one looks with the exception of the energy sector.”
© 2008 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
© 2008 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
What Crisis ?
It gets tedious after a while, reading all the political and media spewing espousing the need for an apolitical solution to an economic – and legal- problem. Superlatives are everywhere: “financial Armageddon”, “global meltdown” “catastrophic failure”….ad nauseam.
Yeah, it’s kinda fun watching history being made, and even more fun attempting to make sense of it. All this talk about the need to protect assets, to ensure credit markets don’t freeze and the risk of sharp inflation - even though SAW suspects that the term “inflation” is a misnomer. It’s probably sharp depreciation in purchasing power caused by too much US Dollars aka Funny Money swilling around.
And talking about Funny Money and credit, exactly what is seizing up? Here’s one theory from a simple lawyer. What is seizing up is the grossly over-inflated, exponentially grown, debt- based supply of money that was, literally, created, out of thin air without reference to anything else.
Whilst greed, fraud, conspiracy and tacit governmental approval are all in the mix, SAW suspects that the (presently legal) practice of Fractional Reserve Banking was exploited to the Nth degree with monstrous effect.
If Customer A deposits $1,000 in the bank, the bank has the legal right to lend the majority of that $1,000 to someone else. So the bank might lend say, $900 to Customer B. That is recorded as an electronic transfer of funds into Customer B’s bank account. Therefore, it is technically a deposit of $900.
That allows the bank to then use that “deposit” of $900 to make a loan of the majority of it to Customer C. So, Customer C might get a loan of say, $800. That would also be by way of an electronic transfer of funds into his account and would technically be regarded as a “deposit” of $800.
Again, the bank would lend the majority of that $800 dollars, say, $700 to Customer D….and the process would be repeated ad infinitum.
All this money (technically “currency” not “money” – there is a difference) is created out of thin air without reference to any underlying asset values. It operates solely as a debt-based creation i.e. the more debt that is created, the more money can be created out of thin air for lending. On that view, the creation of sub-prime mortgages made perfect sense. They were the perfect debt-creation vehicle upon which Fractional Reserve Banking could grow exponentially – and did.
And those sub-prime mortgages were subsequently, sliced, diced, repackaged and resold as “Asset Based” or “Mortgage Based Securities” to Investment Banks and Hedge Funds.
The simple point being made is that the money supply, created out of nowhere and based entirely on debt, was so outrageously large that it bore no relationship to the value of goods and services in the real economy. Putting it another way, the actual hard core assets did not exist to support that level of lending.
If that is correct, the widespread practice of shoving the exotic, and now toxic, debt instruments Off-Balance Sheet (and in many cases Offshore), also made perfect sense. Bringing them onto the Balance Sheet would result in an erosion of actual bank capital –which is exactly what is now happening. That explains the reluctance of banks to lend to each other and the recent spike in LIBOR.
Which is why a US Federal Government Bailout is such a lousy idea: the US Dollar is nothing but a debt-based fiat currency. In its crudest terms, the bailout is debt compounding debt.
Perhaps what we are now seeing is not a credit crisis, but a spectacular and necessary implosion of the debt bubble contracting to a level where the debt is backed by capital assets. Will there be severe restrictions on personal and commercial borrowing in the near term? Yes.
Will there be a change in Wall Street’s mentality? Dream on. People got filthy rich on this scam.
What’s a bet they created this situation up to this point plus the frantic requests for a bailout, in order for the next instalment of their grand scheme to kick in? SAW finds it impossible to swallow the notion that Wall Street is spiraling out of control or has been caught by surprise.
© 2008 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
Yeah, it’s kinda fun watching history being made, and even more fun attempting to make sense of it. All this talk about the need to protect assets, to ensure credit markets don’t freeze and the risk of sharp inflation - even though SAW suspects that the term “inflation” is a misnomer. It’s probably sharp depreciation in purchasing power caused by too much US Dollars aka Funny Money swilling around.
And talking about Funny Money and credit, exactly what is seizing up? Here’s one theory from a simple lawyer. What is seizing up is the grossly over-inflated, exponentially grown, debt- based supply of money that was, literally, created, out of thin air without reference to anything else.
Whilst greed, fraud, conspiracy and tacit governmental approval are all in the mix, SAW suspects that the (presently legal) practice of Fractional Reserve Banking was exploited to the Nth degree with monstrous effect.
If Customer A deposits $1,000 in the bank, the bank has the legal right to lend the majority of that $1,000 to someone else. So the bank might lend say, $900 to Customer B. That is recorded as an electronic transfer of funds into Customer B’s bank account. Therefore, it is technically a deposit of $900.
That allows the bank to then use that “deposit” of $900 to make a loan of the majority of it to Customer C. So, Customer C might get a loan of say, $800. That would also be by way of an electronic transfer of funds into his account and would technically be regarded as a “deposit” of $800.
Again, the bank would lend the majority of that $800 dollars, say, $700 to Customer D….and the process would be repeated ad infinitum.
All this money (technically “currency” not “money” – there is a difference) is created out of thin air without reference to any underlying asset values. It operates solely as a debt-based creation i.e. the more debt that is created, the more money can be created out of thin air for lending. On that view, the creation of sub-prime mortgages made perfect sense. They were the perfect debt-creation vehicle upon which Fractional Reserve Banking could grow exponentially – and did.
And those sub-prime mortgages were subsequently, sliced, diced, repackaged and resold as “Asset Based” or “Mortgage Based Securities” to Investment Banks and Hedge Funds.
The simple point being made is that the money supply, created out of nowhere and based entirely on debt, was so outrageously large that it bore no relationship to the value of goods and services in the real economy. Putting it another way, the actual hard core assets did not exist to support that level of lending.
If that is correct, the widespread practice of shoving the exotic, and now toxic, debt instruments Off-Balance Sheet (and in many cases Offshore), also made perfect sense. Bringing them onto the Balance Sheet would result in an erosion of actual bank capital –which is exactly what is now happening. That explains the reluctance of banks to lend to each other and the recent spike in LIBOR.
Which is why a US Federal Government Bailout is such a lousy idea: the US Dollar is nothing but a debt-based fiat currency. In its crudest terms, the bailout is debt compounding debt.
Perhaps what we are now seeing is not a credit crisis, but a spectacular and necessary implosion of the debt bubble contracting to a level where the debt is backed by capital assets. Will there be severe restrictions on personal and commercial borrowing in the near term? Yes.
Will there be a change in Wall Street’s mentality? Dream on. People got filthy rich on this scam.
What’s a bet they created this situation up to this point plus the frantic requests for a bailout, in order for the next instalment of their grand scheme to kick in? SAW finds it impossible to swallow the notion that Wall Street is spiraling out of control or has been caught by surprise.
© 2008 Sanjeev Aaron Williams All Rights Reserved
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
