Lessons Learned

This blog has dealt extensively with sub-prime. But how does all that relate to private SMEs who are interested in improving their cash flow for the purposes of growth or survival? What lessons can be learned?

1. Surrender of Equity

Factoring does not involve going to foreign investors - Sovereign Wealth Funds in particular - and giving up, or issuing, equity in the company. Just ask Citigroup or Merrill Lynch.

2. Management Changes

The funding source will not demand management changes at Board level as a condition of funding (unless there’s suspected or actual fraud).

3. Debt-Free vs. Debt

Factoring is effectively debt-free growth for the company. It is based on the SALE of the commercial invoice to the factoring company. That invoice, which represents future cash, is a genuine asset. The factor buys it from the company at a discount from its face value and the company gets cash almost immediately. The factor then looks to the company’s ultimate debtor for payment of the full face value of the invoice.

Sub-prime was debt-ridden at all levels with catastrophic results. For the lenders, the “assets” of the individual debtors were either cars or plasma TV sets (which have no residual value) or the assumed ever-increasing value of a home which they knew fully well the debtor could not afford. The basis of sub-prime rested on loading credit challenged individuals with even more debt and then repackaging the “assets” as “safe” corporate investments for Wall Street and beyond.

4. Credit-Worthiness

Factoring is strongly dependent on the credit-worthiness of the company’s ultimate debtor. This is because the ultimate debtor remains liable to the funding source for the face value of the invoice. That is why factoring companies who are buying the invoices, demand to know details of a company’s debtors and run checks on them, including verifying that the invoice issued to the debtor is genuine. If the factor has doubts on the credit-worthiness of the ultimate debtor, funding for those invoices will be refused. Period.

One of the hallmarks of the sub-prime fiasco was that the credit-worthiness of the individual debtor, who often had a lousy credit rating to start with, was fudged or dishonestly recorded to make it appear better than it was. Everybody knew what was going on and simply turned a blind eye. Risk was compounded.

Factoring seeks to minimize uncertainty on 2 fronts: for the company seeking guaranteed predictable cash flow; and for the funding source that assumes the risk of repayment from the ultimate corporate debtor.

© 2008 Sanjeev Aaron Williams & Cashwerks All Rights Reserved

The Personal Guarantee

Many company directors choke when they look at the factoring documentation package and see the requirement for them to sign a Personal Guarantee. Some walk away from the deal altogether, claiming they’ve made enough disclosure. Others say the Personal Guarantee reeks of traditional bank financing.

Let’s make one thing very clear. Corporations, by themselves, don’t commit fraud. It’s the people behind them. The Personal Guarantee is the factor’s safeguard against fraud – and not, as is commonly assumed, an alternative means of recovering payment by going after an individual.

Factors carry credit insurance in respect of funds that they advance on a non-recourse basis. Many factors advance funds pursuant to a Line of Credit that they have with their banks. As a condition of the credit insurance and the bank Line Of Credit, factors are required to obtain a Personal Guarantee from the directors of their customers.

As and when the factor has funded an invoice for which it has not been paid by the ultimate debtor, it is far cheaper to simply off-set the amount against future advances, rather than resorting to litigation via the Personal Guarantee.

© 2007 Sanjeev Aaron Williams & Cashwerks All Rights Reserved